Taalintegratietrajecten Wetenschappelijk rapport

94 • Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review , 6 (1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002 • Snow, C. E. (2014). Input to interaction to instruction: Three key shifts in the history of child language research. Journal of Child Language , 41 (S1), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000294 • Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., & Nation, K. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education , 46 (4), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756 • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Harrison, L. J. (2015). Language development in the early school years: The importance of close relationships with teachers. Developmental Psychology , 51 (2), 185–196. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0038540 • Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 49 (1), 77–96. https://doi. org/10.1177 /0022219414528540 • Suggate, S. P. (2010). Why what we teach depends on when: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology , 46 (6), 1556–1579. • Swanson, E., Stevens, E. A., Scammacca, N. K., Capin, P., Stewart, A. A., & Austin, C. R. (2017). The impact of tier 1 reading instruction on reading outcomes for students in grades 4-12: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing , 30 (8), 1639–1665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9743-3 • Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 , 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 0663.84.3.364 • Tomblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2006). The dimensionality of language ability in school-age children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research , 49 (6), 1193–1208. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/086) • Torgerson, C. J. (2007). The quality of systematic reviews of effectiveness in literacy learning in English: a ‘tertiary’review. Journal of Research in Reading, 30 (3), 287-315. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00318.x • Turner, H., Ncube, M., Turner, A., Boruch, R., & Ibekwe, N. (2018). What are the effects of Teach For America on math, English language arts, and science outcomes of K–12 students in the USA? Campbell Systematic Reviews , 14 (1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.7 • Uccelli, P., Galloway, E. P., Barr, C. D., Meneses, A., & Dobbs, C. L. (2015). Beyond vocabulary: Exploring cross- disciplinary academic-language proficiency and its association with reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 50 (3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.104 • Uccelli, P., Demir-Lira, Ö. E., Rowe, M. L., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Children’s early decontextualized talk predicts academic language proficiency in midadolescence. Child Development , 90 (5), 1650-1663. https://doi. org/10.1111/cdev.13034 • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2018). Table 204.27. English learner (EL) students enrolled in public elementary and secondary schools by home language, grade, and selected student characteristics: Selected years, 2009–10 through fall 2017. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/ tables/dt19_204.27.asp. • Van de Ven, A.H., & Delbecq, A.L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17 (4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.2307/255641 • Van den Branden, K. (2004). Taalbeleid: Een hefboom voor gelijke onderwijskansen. School En Samenleving , 5 , 49–66. • Vanbuel, M., Boderé, A., & Van den Branden, K. (2017). Helpen talenbeleid en taalscreening taalgrenzen verleggen? Een reviewstudie naar effectieve taal stimuleringsmaatregelen. Gent Steunpunt Onderwijsonderzoek. • Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., van Setten, E., & Segers, E. (2020). Computer-supported early literacy intervention effects in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review , 30 , 100325. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100325 • Villiger, C., Hauri, S., Tettenborn, A., Hartmann, E., Napflin, C., Hugener, I., & Niggli, A. (2019). Effectiveness of an extracurricular program for struggling readers: A comparative study with parent tutors and volunteer tutors. Learning and Instruction , 60 , 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.004 • Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N. K., Metz, K., Murray, C. S., Roberts, G., & Danielson, L. (2013). Extensive reading interventions for students with reading difficulties after grade 3. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 163–195. psyh. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313477212 • Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2018). Why wait? The importance of wait time in developing young students’ language and vocabulary skills. The Reading Teacher , 72 (3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1730 • What Works Clearinghouse (2017). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences Retrieved from https://ies. ed. gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks. • Whiting, P., Savović, J., Higgins, J. P., Caldwell, D. M., Reeves, B. C., Shea, B., ... & Churchill, R. (2016). ROBIS: a