Les in Lezen: Onderzoeksluik 1 – Umbrella review van effectief leesonderwijs 127 the subgroups. VS: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. Nation, K., & Castles, A. (2017). Putting the learning in orthographic learning. In K. Cain, D. Compton, & R. Parrila (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 147–168). John Benjamins. *Newell, K. W., Codding, R. S., & Fortune, T. W. (2020). Oral reading fluency as a screening tool with English learners: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 57(8), 1208-1239. N.N. (2015), Wetenschappelijke geletterdheid bij 15-jarigen. Overzicht van de eerste Vlaamse resultaten van PISA2015. Universiteit Gent: Gent. Opgehaald van www.pisa.ugent.be/uploads/assets/140/1485507054477-Vlaams%20 rapport%202015(2).pdf Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & Elbro, C. (2015). Understanding and teaching reading comprehension. A handbook. Routledge. *Ober, T. M., Brooks, P. J., Homer, B. D., & Rindskopf, D. (2020). Executive functions and decoding in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic investigation. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 735-763. *Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215-1239. *Paul, S. A. S., & Clarke, P. J. (2016). A systematic review of reading interventions for secondary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 116-127. *Pei, Y., & O'Brien, K. H. (2021). Reading abilities post traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of speech-language pathology, 30(2), 789-816. *Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., & Tao, S. (2017). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological bulletin, 144(1), 48. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological review, 114, 273-315. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive psychology, 61(2), 106– 151. *Peters, J. L., De Losa, L., Bavin, E. L., & Crewther, S. G. (2019). Efficacy of dynamic visuo-attentional interventions for reading in dyslexic and neurotypical children: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 58-76. *Piasta, S. B., & Wagner, R. K. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading research quarterly, 45(1), 8-38. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115. Polanin, J.R., Maynard, B.R., & Dell, N.A. (2017). Overviews in Education Research: A Systematic Review and Analysis. Review of Educational Research 87(1). 172-203. Pollock, R. , Fernandes, M. Becker, L.A., Pieper, D. & Hartling, L. (2020). Chapter V: Overviews of Reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (Eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. *Prevoo, M. J. L., Malda, M., Mesman, J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2015). Within- and CrossLanguage Relations Between Oral Language Proficiency and School Outcomes in Bilingual Children With an Immigrant Background: A Meta-Analytical Study. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 237-276. DOI: 10.3102/0034654315584685
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3Nzk=