Les in Lezen: Onderzoeksluik 1 – Umbrella review van effectief leesonderwijs 124 *Garwood, J. D., Brunsting, N. C., & Fox, L. C. (2014). Improving reading comprehension and fluency outcomes for adolescents with emotional-behavioral disorders: Recent research synthesized. Remedial and Special Education, 35(3), 181-194. *Gatlin, B., & Wanzek, J. (2015). Relations among children's use of dialect and literacy skills: A metaanalysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(4), 1306-1318. *Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401-427. Geudens, A., Schraeyen, K., Taelman, H., Trioen, M., Casteleyn, J., Simons, M., & Smits, T.F.H. (2021). Bouwstenen voor effectieve taaltrajecten. Praktijkgids voor taalondersteuning in het kleuter-, lager en secundair onderwijs. Universiteit Antwerpen. http://www.taaltrajecten.be Geudens, A., & Van den Broeck, W. (2016). De rol van alfabetische en woord-specifieke kennis in didactiek en interventie van technisch lezen. In W. Van den Broeck (Ed.), Handboek dyslexieonderzoek. Wetenschappelijke inzichten in diagnostiek, oorzaken, preventie en behandeling van dyslexie. (pp. 127-152). Acco. Geva, E. & Genesee, F. (2006). First-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Ed.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 185–195). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Goedseels, E., Vettenburg, N., & Walgrave, L. (2000). Vrienden en Vrije Tijd, In: De Witte et al. (Eds.), Jongeren in Vlaanderen: gemeten en geteld. Universitaire Pers. *Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of dyslexia, 60(2), 183-208. *Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of reading, 17(4), 257-285. *Gordon, R. L., Fehd, H. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2015). Does music training enhance literacy skills? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1777. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. *Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard educational review, 81(4), 710-744. *Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2017). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279-304. *Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703-1743. Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., & Vadasy, P. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of Read Well Kindergarten. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 53–86. *Guzman, G., Goldberg, T. S., & Swanson, H. L. (2018). A meta-analysis of self-monitoring on reading performance of K–12 students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 160. *Hall-Mills, S. S., & Marante, L. M. (2020). Explicit text structure instruction supports expository text comprehension for adolescents with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(1), 55-68. *Hall, C., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., McCulley, L. V., Carroll, M., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Reading instruction for English learners in the middle grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 763-794. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106(3), 491–528. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor Between Visual and Phonological Processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTg3Nzk=